- Interested in Doing Research?
- Submit a Case for Publication
- Research Forms
- Carrick Institute MEDLINE™ Portal
The most difficult problem we face in review of manuscripts is poor language or grammar. It is a huge shame to reject articles because they are badly written when the message they contain is important. The language reflects the authors, their institution and the journal, and inevitably, presentation and style hugely influences the perception of the management of any case
- Read the case presentation back to yourself. Is there a natural flow from presentation to discharge and follow-up? Are all decisions explained?
- unusual presentations of common cases
- inconclusive results
- grey areas in indications for treatment
- management challenges
- near misses
Title of CaseYou do not need to include “a case report” in the title – you may be cryptic if you wish. In fact, we do not want you to use the words “a case report”.
SummaryUp to 150 words summarizing the case presentation and outcome We need a good flavor of the case – emphasize the learning points.
BackgroundWhy you think this case is important – why did you write it up? Why is the case of interest to our readers? Is this a prevalent health problem? Is there a clear message?
Case PresentationPresenting features, medical / social / family history This is the patient’s story – but please be sensitive to patient confidentiality
- How did they present?
- What is the relevant history? Why is this relevant?
- Explain your findings and how they influenced your decisions.
Investigations – If relevantAll investigations that create a background (baseline) picture are relevant. All investigations that are crucial to management decisions should be discussed in full. Chose appropriate images and videos to illustrate your point while maintaining patient confidentiality.
Differential Diagnosis (if relevant)Please don’t list these. What we want to see is how the final diagnosis is teased out. What are the consequences to management or treatment for the differential diagnosis? For example: A man in his 60’s who has smoked for 40 years and presents with epigastric pain radiating posteriorly may have a leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute pancreatitis or a perforated duodenal ulcer. Particular historical details and investigations separate these diagnoses, and treatment of each is vastly different; indeed, treating one cause for the other is detrimental. Discuss these and the pitfalls that may ensue.
Treatment (if relevant)Include pharmacological and non-pharmacological, eg, rehab strategies, exercises, therapies, home therapy and patient instructions.
Outcome and Follow-Up
Always include follow up data where you can; it gives readers a clear understanding of outcome. The follow-up period should be clearly defined. Please state if the patient has died even if not directly related to your case.This is a required section. Should be about 3-5 bullet points. These are the most crucial parts of the case – what do you want readers to remember when seeing their own patients?